4.6 Article

PhaLP: A Database for the Study of Phage Lytic Proteins and Their Evolution

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13071240

关键词

phage lytic proteins; endolysins; machine learning; biological database; conserved protein domains; protein architectures

类别

资金

  1. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [1S38519N, G066919N, 17/PDO/067]
  2. Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen [HBC.2020.2292]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phage lytic proteins are a type of advanced antibiotic known as enzybiotics, and PhaLP database offers comprehensive and easily accessible information on these proteins, serving as a valuable resource for researchers in the field.
Phage lytic proteins are a clinically advanced class of novel enzyme-based antibiotics, so-called enzybiotics. A growing community of researchers develops phage lytic proteins with the perspective of their use as enzybiotics. A successful translation of enzybiotics to the market requires well-considered selections of phage lytic proteins in early research stages. Here, we introduce PhaLP, a database of phage lytic proteins, which serves as an open portal to facilitate the development of phage lytic proteins. PhaLP is a comprehensive, easily accessible and automatically updated database (currently 16,095 entries). Capitalizing on the rich content of PhaLP, we have mapped the high diversity of natural phage lytic proteins and conducted analyses at three levels to gain insight in their host-specific evolution. First, we provide an overview of the modular diversity. Secondly, datamining and interpretable machine learning approaches were adopted to reveal host-specific design rules for domain architectures in endolysins. Lastly, the evolution of phage lytic proteins on the protein sequence level was explored, revealing host-specific clusters. In sum, PhaLP can act as a starting point for the broad community of enzybiotic researchers, while the steadily improving evolutionary insights will serve as a natural inspiration for protein engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据