4.6 Article

An Absolutely Conserved Tryptophan in the Stem of the Envelope Protein E of Flaviviruses Is Essential for the Formation of Stable Particles

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13091727

关键词

flaviviruses; envelope protein E; stem region; flavivirus assembly; tick-borne encephalitis virus

类别

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I1378-B13, P27501-B21]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P27501] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conserved tryptophan in the major envelope protein E of flaviviruses, or another big hydrophobic amino acid in the same position, plays a crucial role in virus assembly and infectivity by contributing to the stability of infectious particles.
The major envelope protein E of flaviviruses contains an ectodomain that is connected to the transmembrane domain by the so-called stem region. In mature flavivirus particles, the stem is composed of two or three mostly amphipathic alpha-helices and a conserved sequence element (CS) with an undefined role in the viral life cycle. A tryptophan is the only residue within this region which is not only conserved in all vector-borne flaviviruses, but also in the group with no known vector. We investigated the importance of this residue in different stages of the viral life cycle by a mutagenesis-based approach using tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV). Replacing W421 by alanine or histidine strongly reduced the release of infectious virions and their thermostability, whereas fusion-related entry functions and virus maturation were still intact. Serial passaging of the mutants led to the emergence of a same-site compensatory mutation to leucine that largely restored these properties of the wildtype. The conserved tryptophan in CS (or another big hydrophobic amino acid at the same position) is thus essential for the assembly and infectivity of flaviviruses by being part of a network required for conferring stability to infectious particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据