4.5 Article

Including fossils in phylogeny: a glimpse into the evolution of the superfamily Evanioidea (Hymenoptera: Apocrita) under tip-dating and the fossilized birth-death process

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 194, 期 4, 页码 1396-1423

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab034

关键词

amber; Bayesian inference; calibration; morphological phylogeny; time divergence; wasps

类别

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB26000000]
  2. Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research [2019QZKK0706]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41688103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new phylogeny of the superfamily Evanioidea is proposed using a fossilized birth-death model, estimating divergence times and proving the monophyly of Evanioidea. Additionally, three new othniodellithid wasps are described in this study.
Using a fossilized birth-death model, a new phylogeny of the superfamily Evanioidea (including ensign wasps, nightshade wasps and hatchet wasps) is proposed, with estimates of divergence times for its constitutive families and for corroborating the monophyly of Evanioidea. Additionally, our Bayesian analyses demonstrate the monophyly of dagger Anomopterellidae, dagger Othniodellithidae, dagger Andreneliidae, Aulacidae, Gasteruptiida and Evaniidae, whereas dagger Praeaulacidae and dagger Baissidae appear to be paraphyletic. Vectevania vetula and Hyptiogastrites electrinus are transferred to Aulacidae. We estimate the divergence time of Evanioidea to be in the Late Triassic (similar to 203 Mya). Additionally, three new othniodellithid wasps are described and figured from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber as the new genus Keratodellitha, with three new species: Keratodellitha anubis sp. nov., Keratodellitha basilisci sp. nov. and Keratodellitha kirin sp. nov. We also document a temporal shift in relative species richness between Ichneumonoidea and Evanioidea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据