4.5 Article

Wanted, tracked down and identified: Mesozoic non-biting midges of the subfamily Chironominae (Chironomidae, Diptera)

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab020

关键词

amber; Cretaceous; evolution; new taxa; Pseudochironomini; systematics

类别

资金

  1. Polish National Science Centre grant [UMO-2016/23/B/NZ8/00936]
  2. University of Gdask, Poland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides evidence for the presence of non-biting midges of the subfamily Chironominae in the Mesozoic, based on descriptions of rare amber inclusions. A previously reported record from Late Cretaceous Taimyr amber has been revised and confirmed, with a new find in Burmese amber extending the temporal boundary of the subfamily. The discovery of two new genera in amber specimens sheds light on the phylogeny and diversification tempo of the Chironominae and Pseudochironomini in the past.
Here we provide evidence for the presence of non-biting midges of the subfamily Chironominae in the Mesozoic, based on descriptions of exceptionally rare amber inclusions. The subfamily has already been reported, but based on a single and unspecified record from Late Cretaceous Taimyr amber (similar to 84 Mya). That record is here revised and confirmed. Moreover, a new find in Burmese amber locates the temporal boundary of the subfamily back to the mid-Cretaceous (probably similar to 100 Mya). We describe two new genera assigned to the tribe Pseudochironomini: Mesoacentron gen. nov. with the species Mesoacentron kaluginae sp. nov. (Taimyr amber) and Palaeocentron gen. nov. with the species Palaeocentron krzeminskii sp. nov. (Burmese amber), the oldest known representative of the subfamily. The systematic position of the new taxa is discussed, and a key to the identification of adult males of extinct and extant Pseudochironomini genera is presented. Insights in the phylogeny and diversification tempo of the Chironominae and Pseudochironomini in the past are also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据