4.2 Article

Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software, Phenomenology, and Colaizzi's Method

期刊

WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 12, 页码 1117-1123

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/01939459211030335

关键词

Data analysis; Colaizzi's method; Computer-Assisted Qualitative Software (CAQDAS); Phenomenology; Qualitative

类别

资金

  1. NIH [NR11147]
  2. UI College of Nursing Class of 1969 Scholarship
  3. National Association for Neonatal Nurses Research Grant
  4. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [U54TR001356]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Technology is widely used for supporting qualitative research, with CAQDAS providing efficient data management and analysis transparency. However, heavy emphasis on coding and a steep learning curve may be drawbacks. Researchers in a study utilizing NVivo ultimately turned to phenomenology and Colaizzi's method for their final analysis.
Technology is widely used to support qualitative research. Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) encompasses complementary technologies to support qualitative analysis. Advantages of CAQDAS include efficient management of data and transparency in analysis. Disadvantages include heavy emphasis on coding as a distractor from analysis and considerable time to learn the program. In this methods article, we, as less experienced, qualitative researchers describe our experiences using NVivo, a CAQDAS program, in a descriptive phenomenological study using Colaizzi's method. Over 1 year, 24 postpartum women were given a secure research link to record their experiences with pain and depression during the third trimester of pregnancy. Although NVivo analysis was helpful, the philosophy of phenomenology, reflexivity, and Colaizzi's method directed researchers away from NVivo for the final summation. Recommendations for future use of CAQDAS used concurrently with Colaizzi's method include the use of word clouds and other visualizations for bracketing and triangulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据