4.7 Article

Light and Shadow in Mapping Alpine Snowpack With Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Absence of Ground Control Points

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020WR028980

关键词

UAV observations; snow distribution; mountain areas; ground control points; structure from motion

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CGL2017-82216-R]
  2. JPI-Climate
  3. FORMAS (SE)
  4. DLR (DE)
  5. BMWFW (AT)
  6. IFD (DK)
  7. MINECO (ES)
  8. ANR (FR)
  9. European Union [690462]
  10. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [IJC2018-036260-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study assessed the reliability of snow depth observations from a fixed-wing UAV in complex alpine terrain, finding that results under direct sunlight were comparable to those using ground control points, but errors tripled when terrain shadows or cloud-covered sunlight were present.
Recent developments in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and structure from motion (SfM) algorithms have shown reliable results for retrieving snow depth distribution. However, their ability to obtain accurate results usually relies on deploying and measuring the exact position of ground control points (GCP) for georeferencing the information. Commercial UAVs can now provide real time kinematic (RTK) positioning of the images with centimetric accuracy. Nonetheless, their operational applicability for observing snow distribution in highly heterogeneous mountain areas has not been evaluated. This study presents a complete assessment of the reliability of snow depth observations from a fixed-wing UAV working in RTK mode with an RGB camera. During the 2018-2019 season, seven field campaigns (13 UAV flights) were undertaken covering 0.48 km(2) in complex alpine terrain in the Pyrenees. The UAV observations obtained under different light conditions and flight block configurations (altitude and image overlaps) in the same day were evaluated with terrestrial laser scanner acquisitions. Two SfM processing options of the UAV images were also compared. When the study area received direct solar light, the results were comparable to previous studies that had used GCPs, with an average root mean squared error of 0.19 m and an average absolute snow volume discrepancy lower than 4%. However, when large areas were under shadow from the terrain, or solar light was affected by clouds, the estimated error tripled. The quality of the snow depth maps was little affected by the snow covered area and the flight mission configurations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据