4.6 Article

Microplastic Contamination in Protected Areas of the Gulf of Venice

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 232, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-021-05323-9

关键词

Microplastics; Special Areas of Conservation; Polymer composition; Gulf of Venice; FT-IR spectroscopy

资金

  1. Universita degli Studi di Ferrara within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The investigation of plastics concentration and composition in 7 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in the Gulf of Venice revealed pollution in all sites except one, with the highest plastic concentrations generally recorded in western SACs. Identification through FT-IR spectroscopy showed that plastics were mainly composed of low-density polymers. Furthermore, the role of major rivers and cyclonic water circulation of the northern Adriatic Sea in conveying and distributing plastics along the Gulf coasts was suggested.
We investigated the concentration and composition of plastics in 7 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) from the Gulf of Venice (northern Adriatic Sea). A total of 42 sediment samples were analyzed from 21 sites from 2017 to 2018. All sites except one were found to be polluted by plastics, with density ranging between 2250 and 28.4 items kg(-1). Microplastics ranged from 100 to 61.6% of the collected plastics. Fragments were more represented than filaments. The greatest plastic concentrations were generally recorded in western SACs. Identification through FT-IR spectroscopy evidenced the presence of 8 polymer types: in western SACS, the majority were low-density polymers (PE, PP, PS, and TPU), while in eastern SACs they were high-density polymers (PET, nylon, and PVC). In addition to the role of large rivers (all on the western side of the Gulf) in conveying plastics into the sea, a possible role of the cyclonic water circulation of the northern Adriatic Sea on distribution and composition of plastics along the Gulf coasts is likely.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据