4.6 Article

Iron-Modified Biochar from Sugarcane Straw to Remove Arsenic and Lead from Contaminated Water

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 232, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-021-05343-5

关键词

Ferric chloride; Dissolved organic carbon; Kinetics; Contamination; Sorption

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2019/068979]
  2. Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development-Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [140830/2018-9]
  3. CNPq [132590/2019-0, 306429/2018-7]
  4. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education PersonnelCoordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the use of FeCl3-modified biochar was an efficient strategy to remove As and Pb from water contaminated by mining activity. Sorption on biochar followed the pseudo-second-order kinetics, with higher sorption speeds at the beginning that decreased over time, while modification with FeCl3 increased the specific surface area and enhanced the Pb sorption capacity of BC350.
The presence of arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) in water above tolerable levels is a global concern, as both elements are extremely toxic and can compromise the health of millions of people. In this study, we evaluated biochars pyrolyzed at 350 (BC350) and 750 degrees C (BC750) and then modified with ferric chloride (FeCl3) to remove As and Pb from water samples contaminated by mining activity. The use of FeCl3-modified biochar was an efficient strategy to remove As and Pb from water. Sorption on biochars followed the pseudo-second-order kinetics, represented by two sorption speeds, being higher at the beginning of the reaction and falling over time. The modification with FeCl3 increased the specific surface area, removed the dissolved organic carbon, and increased the capacity of BC350 to sorb Pb. These physical and chemical alterations of the biochar played a significant role in the sorption capacity and speed of As and Pb.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据