4.5 Article

Analyses of propagation processes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophages S13′ and S25-3 in two different taxonomies by definitive screening design

期刊

VIRUS RESEARCH
卷 298, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198406

关键词

Bacteriophage propagation; Phage therapy; Staphylococcus aureus; Process development; Design of experiments; Definitive screening design

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [JP18K07127]
  2. Azabu University, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the propagation processes of phages need to be tailored according to the type of phage, and careful consideration should be given to the choice of methodologies for measuring phage concentration.
To introduce phage therapy against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Western medicine, the establishment of phage manufacturing, particularly phage propagation, is indispensable. For the propagation of S. aureus phages, knowledge of the effects of phage types, process parameters, and analytical methodologies should be investigated. In this study, S. aureus phage propagations were studied in a flask with a new class of design of experiments, definitive screening design, using S. aureus phages S13' and S25-3 in different taxonomies. Four process parameters, namely, multiplicity of infection, bacterial density at infection, time of harvest, and temperature, were evaluated with the regression models based on the phage concentration data measured using plaque assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. As a result, phage propagations measured using plaque assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction were overall similar to each other in the case of phage S13', while they differed in the case of phage S25-3. These results suggest that the propagation processes need to be developed according to phage type, and the choice of methodologies for phage concentration measurements should be carefully considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据