4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Access to Urologic Care at Urgent Care Centers

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 124-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.009

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found disparities in Medicaid insurance access for patients seeking urologic care at urgent care centers in the US. Medicaid-insured patients were less likely to be accepted and referred to specialists compared to those with commercial insurance. Expansion of Medicaid and affiliation with an institution were associated with increased acceptance of Medicaid.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate Medicaid insurance access disparities for urologic care at urgent care centers (UCCs) in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study using a secret shopper methodology. We sampled 240 UCCs across 8 states. Using a standardized script, researchers posed as a patient with either Medicaid or commercial insurance in the clinical setting of obstructing nephrolithiasis. The primary study endpoint was whether a patient's insurance (Medicaid vs commercial) was accepted. We assessed factors associated with Medicaid acceptance using logistic regression models adjusted for state-level and facility-level characteristics. Additionally, we calculated triage rates, emergency department referral rates, and the ability of a UCC to refer the patient to a specialist. RESULTS Of 240 UCCs contacted, 239 (99.6%) accepted commercial insurance and 159 (66.2%) accepted Medicaid. UCCs in Medicaid expansion states more frequently accepted patients with Medicaid insurance (74.2% vs 58.3%, respectively, P <.01). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, state Medicaid expansion (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.04-3.26, P =.04) and affiliation with an institution (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.59-5.57, P <.01) were independently associated with greater odds of accepting Medicaid. Medicaid-insured patients were significantly less likely to be triaged or referred to the emergency department compared to commercial patients. CONCLUSION We identified significant disparities in access to UCCs for Medicaid patients presenting with a urologic condition. Given the expanding national role of UCCs, these findings highlight potential sources of insurance disparity in the context of a urologic emergency. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据