4.5 Article

NOVEL ESTIMATION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURE USING 3-D SPECKLE-TRACKING ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: ASSESSMENT IN A DECOMPENSATED SYSTOLIC HEART FAILURE MODEL

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 1536-1547

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.02.008

关键词

Filling pressure; Heart failure; Myocardial strain; Speckle-tracking echocardiography; Three-dimensional

资金

  1. Canon Medical Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The parameter FRe/SRe may provide a more accurate estimation of left ventricular filling pressure in dilated systolic failing hearts compared to E/e', as it can be obtained without the use of Doppler and showed higher correlation coefficients with LV end-diastolic pressure in a study involving dogs with decompensated heart failure.
E/e' allows for the non-invasive estimation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure; however, Doppler malalignment can make the estimation unreliable, especially in dilated systolic failing hearts. The ratio of peak early diastolic filling rate to peak early diastolic global strain rate (FRe/SRe), which is a parameter derived from 3-D speckle-tracking echocardiography to estimate filling pressure, may be better applied in dilated systolic failing hearts because it can be obtained without the Doppler method. We investigated whether FRe/SRe could provide a better estimation of filling pressure than E/e' in 23 dogs with decompensated systolic heart failure induced by microembolization. FRe/SRe had better correlation coefficients with LV end-diastolic pressure (0.75-0.90) than did E/e' (0.40). The diagnostic accuracy of FRe/SRe in distinguishing elevated filling pressure was significantly higher than that of E/e'. This study indicates that FRe/SRe may provide a better estimation of LV filling pressure than E/e' in dilated systolic failing hearts. (C) 2021 The Author (s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据