4.7 Article

Combination of supercritical CO2 and high-power ultrasound for the inactivation of fungal and bacterial spores in lipid emulsions

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105636

关键词

Spores; Inactivation; Supercritical fluids; Ultrasound; Emulsions

资金

  1. Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the intensification of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) treatments using high-power ultrasound (HPU) for inactivating fungal and bacterial spores in oil-in-water emulsions. The results showed that HPU enhanced the inactivation of bacterial spores, but had limited impact on fungal spores.
For the first time, this study addresses the intensification of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) treatments using high-power ultrasound (HPU) for the inactivation of fungal (Aspergillus niger) and bacterial (Clostridium butyricum) spores in oil-in-water emulsions. The inactivation kinetics were analyzed at different pressures (100, 350 and 550 bar) and temperatures (50, 60, 70, 80, 85 degrees C), depending on the microorganism, and compared to the conventional thermal treatment. The inactivation kinetics were satisfactorily described using the Weibull model. Experimental results showed that SC-CO2 enhanced the inactivation level of both spores when compared to thermal treatments. Bacterial spores (C. butyricum) were found to be more resistant to SC-CO2 + HPU, than fungal (A. niger) ones, as also observed in the thermal and SC-CO2 treatments. The application of HPU intensified the SC-CO2 inactivation of C. butyricum spores, e.g. shortening the total inactivation time from 10 to 3 min at 85 degrees C. However, HPU did not affect the SC-CO2 inactivation of A. niger spores. The study into the effect of a combined SC-CO2 + HPU treatment has to be necessarily extended to other fungal and bacterial spores, and future studies should elucidate the impact of HPU application on the emulsion's stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据