4.4 Article

Reconstructing porous structures from FIB-SEM image data: Optimizing sampling scheme and image processing

期刊

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113291

关键词

3D imaging; Focused ion beam; Scanning electron microscopy; Microstructure characterization; Coarsening; Porous media; Permeability; Boolean model; Anisotropy

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany through project REPOS [03VP00491/5]
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) through the Ph.D. program Mathematics in Industry and Commerce''

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spatial imaging of nano-porous materials using focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) involves generating a stack of SEM images that are segmented and reconstructed for structural characterization using advanced algorithms. The influence of the original image's voxel size on estimates of morphological characteristics and effective permeabilities is studied, with a focus on anisotropies due to the FIB-SEM typical anisotropic sampling. Quantitative comparison of morphological descriptors and flow properties of reconstructed data is facilitated by using synthetic FIB-SEM sets with a known ground truth.
Nano-porous materials can be imaged spatially by focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM). This method generates a stack of SEM images that has to be segmented (or reconstructed) to serve as basis for structural characterization. To this end, we apply two state-of-the-art algorithms. We study the influence of the original image's voxel size on estimates of morphological characteristics and effective permeabilities. Special attention is paid to analyzing anisotropies due to the FIB-SEM typical anisotropic sampling. Quantitative comparison of morphological descriptors and flow properties of reconstructed data is enabled by the use of synthetic FIB-SEM sets for which a ground truth is available. Moreover, in that case, reconstruction parameters can be chosen optimally, too.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据