4.6 Review

Therapeutic and prognostic insights from the analysis of cancer mutational signatures

期刊

TRENDS IN GENETICS
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 194-208

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.08.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CA216354, R01CA216391]
  2. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities of St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Somatic mutations in cancer genomes are caused by multiple mutational processes, each leaving a characteristic imprint. Decoding these imprints can provide insights into the evolutionary history of tumors. Mutational signatures can also offer therapeutic and prognostic insights, acting as biomarkers for drug response and prognosis. Additionally, therapy-induced mutational signatures have been associated with cancer progression.
The somatic mutations in each cancer genome are caused by multiple mutational processes, each of which leaves a characteristic imprint (or 'signature'), potentially caused by specific etiologies or exposures. Deconvolution of these signatures offers a glimpse into the evolutionary history of individual tumors. Recent work has shown that mutational signatures may also yield therapeutic and prognostic insights, including the identification of cell-intrinsic signatures as biomarkers of drug response and prognosis. For example, mutational signatures indicating homologous recombination deficiency are associated with poly(ADP)ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor sensitivity, whereas APOBEC-associated signatures are associated with ataxia telangiectasia and Rada-related kinase (ATR) inhibitor sensitivity. Furthermore, therapy-induced mutational signatures implicated in cancer progression have also been uncovered, including the identification of thiopurine-induced TP53 mutations in leukemia. In this review, we explore the various ways mutational signatures can reveal new therapeutic and prognostic insights, thus extending their traditional role in identifying disease etiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据