4.4 Article

Empirical Estimation of Shortest Route Length along US Interstate Highways Based on Great Circle Distance

期刊

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD
卷 2675, 期 10, 页码 1248-1253

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/03611981211015251

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office (Analysis Program)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-0OR22725]
  3. DOE Public Access Plan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed 98 regression models for estimating shortest distances based on great circle distances along U.S. interstate highways and for each state, showing that models without intercepts generally have better fitness and significant variations in slope coefficients exist at the state level. Additionally, a preliminary analysis of the effect of highway density on this variation was conducted.
In this study, 98 regression models were specified for easily estimating shortest distances based on great circle distances along the U.S. interstate highways nationwide and for each of the continental 48 states. This allows transportation professionals to quickly generate distance, or even distance matrix, without expending significant efforts on complicated shortest path calculations. For simple usage by all professionals, all models are present in the simple linear regression form. Only one explanatory variable, the great circle distance, is considered to calculate the route distance. For each geographic scope (i.e., the national or one of the states), two different models were considered, with and without the intercept. Based on the adjusted R-squared, it was observed that models without intercepts generally have better fitness. All these models generally have good fitness with the linear regression relationship between the great circle distance and route distance. At the state level, significant variations in the slope coefficients between the state-level models were also observed. Furthermore, a preliminary analysis of the effect of highway density on this variation was conducted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据