4.7 Article

Ramp metering control under stochastic capacity in a connected environment: A dynamic bargaining game theory approach

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103282

关键词

Ramp metering; Stochastic capacity; Connected vehicles; Bargaining game

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a dynamic predictive and cooperative ramp metering method that takes stochastic breakdowns at merging bottlenecks into consideration. It uses a stochastic microscopic model to estimate traffic state parameters and models the ramp metering problem as a stochastic distributed model predictive control (SDMPC) approach solved through a game method.
This paper presents a dynamic predictive and cooperative ramp metering approach that considers stochastic breakdowns at merging bottlenecks. A stochastic microscopic model is used to estimate traffic state parameters based on speed, location, and travel time information from connected vehicles. Traffic state predictions are obtained on a lane by lane basis using an adaptive Kalman filter (AKF) that fuses fixed detector measurements with the model; the AKF then produces multiple step ahead predictions. The ramp metering problem in this paper is modeled as a stochastic distributed model predictive control (SDMPC) approach. The SDMPC problem is solved based on a bargaining game approach where each controller, a player in the game, receives traffic state and control decision information from other controllers to solve the local optimization problem based on expected local costs and constraints. The performance of the proposed model is evaluated for three aspects of efficiency: short-term and long-term equity and effectiveness compared to multiple control scenarios. The outcomes indicate that the proposed cooperative model with stochastic capacity considerations outperforms the deterministic capacity-based models in regard to effectiveness and equity properties. However, the centralized approach performs slightly better in respect to system-wide efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据