4.6 Article

Frailty Measures in Patients Listed for Lung Transplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 106, 期 5, 页码 1084-1092

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003823

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of cognitive impairment, depression, or both on the assessment of physical frailty, and found that the addition of these factors increased the number of patients classified as frail but did not strengthen the association with LTX waitlist mortality.
Background. The study aimed to determine whether the addition of cognitive impairment, depression, or both, to the assessment of physical frailty (PF) is associated with the risk of lung transplant (LTX) waitlist mortality. Methods. Since March 2013, all patients referred for LTX evaluation underwent PF assessment. Cognition was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and depression assessed using the Depression in Medical Illness questionnaire. We assessed the association of 4 composite frailty measures: PF >= 3 of 5 = frail, cognitive frailty (CogF >= 3 of 6 = frail), depressive frailty (DepF >= 3 of 6 = frail), and combined frailty (ComF >= 3 of 7 = frail) with waitlist mortality. Results. The prevalence of PF was 78 (22%), CogF 100 (28%), DepF 105 (29%), and ComF 124 (34%). Waitlist survival in the non-PF group was 94% +/- 2% versus 71% +/- 7% in the PF group (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that PF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 4.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.06-11.56), mild cognitive impairment (adjusted HR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.05-8.78), and hypoalbuminemia (adjusted HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97) were independent predictors of waitlist mortality. There was no significant difference in the area under the curve of the 4 frailty measures. Conclusions. The addition of cognitive function and depression variables to the PF assessment increased the number of patients classified as frail. However, the addition of these variables does not strengthen the association with LTX waitlist mortality compared with the PF measure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据