4.6 Article

Stability of African swine fever virus on spiked spray-dried porcine plasma

期刊

TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 2806-2811

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14192

关键词

African swine fever virus; contamination of SDPP; disease introduction; risk factor; stability

资金

  1. FLI Internal ASF Research Network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that storing contaminated SDPP at room temperature for at least 2 weeks can significantly reduce the risk of ASFV transmission. In contrast, heavily contaminated SDPP stored at 4 degrees Celsius may remain infectious for at least 5 weeks.
African swine fever (ASF) is a viral disease that affects members of the Suidae family. The notifiable disease is considered a major threat to the pig industry, animal health, and food security worldwide. According to the European Food Safety Authority, ASF virus (ASFV) survival and transmission in feed and feed materials is a major research gap. Against this background, the objective of this study was to determine the survival of ASFV on spiked spray-dried porcine plasma (SDPP) when stored at two different temperatures. To this means, commercial SDPP granules were contaminated with high titers of ASFV in a worst-case external contamination scenario. Three samples per time point and temperature condition were subjected to blind passaging on macrophage cultures and subsequent haemadsorption test to determine residual infectivity. In addition, viral genome was detected by real-time PCR. The results indicate that heavily contaminated SDPP stored at 4 degrees C remains infectious for at least 5 weeks. In contrast, spiked SDPP stored at room temperature displayed a distinct ASFV titer reduction after 1 week (>2.8 log levels) and complete inactivation after 2 weeks (>5.7 log levels). In conclusion, the residual risk of ASFV transmission through externally contaminated SDPP is low if SDPP is stored at room temperature (21 +/- 2 degrees C) for a period of at least 2 weeks before feeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据