4.4 Article

The Role of Counterions in Intermolecular Radical Coupling of Ru-bda Catalysts

期刊

TOPICS IN CATALYSIS
卷 65, 期 1-4, 页码 383-391

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-021-01492-3

关键词

Solvent effects; Intermolecular radical coupling; Counterion effect; Catalysis; Aprotic solvents

资金

  1. Royal Institute of Technology
  2. Vetenskapsradet [VR 2018-05396]
  3. Knut & Alice Wallenberg (KAW) project CATSS [KAW 2016.0072]
  4. High Performance Computing Center at Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan (KTH-PDC) in Stockholm [SNIC 2020/6-547]
  5. National Supercomputing Center in Linkoping, Sweden [SNIC 2021/5-42, SNIC 2020/6-18]
  6. Vinnova [2018-05396] Funding Source: Vinnova
  7. Swedish Research Council [2018-05396] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intermolecular radical coupling is a main mechanism for O-O bond formation in water oxidation catalysts, with significant driving force in water solution being the hydrophobic effects. The same catalyst has also been successfully employed in generating -N2 from ammonia, but in acetonitrile where hydrophilic effects are absent. In both solvents, dimerization of the key intermediate complex occurs with similar free energy profiles, though ion-pairing is more significant in acetonitrile.
Intermolecular radical coupling (also interaction of two metal centers I2M) is one of the main mechanisms for O-O bond formation in water oxidation catalysts. For Ru(bda)L-2 (H(2)bda = 2,2'-bipyridine-6,6'-dicarboxylate, L = pyridine or similar nitrogen containing heterocyclic ligands) catalysts a significant driving force in water solution is the hydrophobic effects driven by the solvent. The same catalyst has been successfully employed to generate -N2 from ammonia, also via I2M, but here the solvent was acetonitrile where hydrophobic effects are absent. We used a classical force field for the key intermediate [(RuN)-N-VI(bda)(py)(2)](+) to simulate the dimerization free energy by calculation of the potential mean force, in both water and acetonitrile to understand the differences and similarities. In both solvents the complex dimerizes with similar free energy profiles. In water the complexes are essentially free cations with limited ion paring, while in acetonitrile the ion-pairing is much more significant. This ion-pairing leads to significant screening of the charges, making dimerization possible despite lower solvent polarity that could lead to repulsion between the charged complexes. In water the lower ion pairing is compensated by the hydrophobic effect leading to favorable dimerization despite repulsion of the charges. A hypothetical doubly charged [(RuIN)-I-VI(bda)py(2)](2+) was also studied for deeper understanding of the charge effect. Despite the double charge the complexes only dimerized favorably in the lower dielectric solvent acetonitrile, while in water the separated state is more stable. In the doubly charged catalyst the effect of ion-pairing is even more pronounced in acetonitrile where it is fully paired similar to the 1+ complex, while in water the separation of the ions leads to greater repulsion between the two catalysts, which prevents dimerization. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据