4.7 Article

A novel type of tubular structure with auxeticity both in radial direction and wall thickness

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107758

关键词

Auxetic; Tubular structure; Auxeticity in tube wall; Rotation method; Deformation mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978330, 51778283, 51678082, 51808287]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation for the Youth of China [51808286]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180710]
  4. Innovation Project for Graduate Student of Jiangsu Province [KYCX20_1009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel tubular structure with auxeticity in both wall thickness and radial direction has been proposed, showing good stability under axial compression. The innovative feature lies in opposite deformation directions of its inner and outer diameter. This structure's closed tube wall surfaces broaden its applications in civil and mechanical engineering fields.
A novel type of tubular structure has been proposed in this paper, which is the first tubular structure with auxeticity in the wall thickness as well as in the radial direction. This tubular structure exhibits good stability under axial compression. The most innovative feature is that its inner diameter and outer diameter have opposite deformation directions. When axially compressed (stretched), its outer diameter will become smaller (larger) while its inner diameter will become larger (smaller). Besides, its closed surfaces of tube wall can broaden its applications in the fields of civil engineering and mechanical engineering. The accuracy of the finite element model was verified by comparison between experiments and numerical analysis. Deformation characteristics of tubular models generated by offset method and rotation method were studied. The influence of cell layers, PSF (Pattern Scale Factor) value and t/R (the ratio of wall thickness t to diameter R) value was also studied by parametric analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据