4.7 Article

Influence of standoff distance on the deformation of square steel plates subjected to internal blast loadings

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107914

关键词

Standoff distance; Internal blast experiment; Saturated impulse effect; Numerical modelling

资金

  1. Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study combines experimental and numerical approaches to investigate the influence of standoff distance on large inelastic deformation of square steel plates under fully-confined internal blast loading. The results show that increasing standoff distance leads to a monotonic increase in permanent central displacement, contradictory to free-air blast scenarios. Numerical predictions reveal complex pressure wave interactions and saturated impulse effects contributing to this phenomenon.
This study presents a combining experimental and numerical efforts on elucidating the influence of the standoff distance on large inelastic deformation of square steel plates subjected to the fully-confined internal blast loading from TNT detonation. Experimental results reveal that increasing standoff distance could lead to a monotonic increase of permanent central displacement of the target plate, which contradicts the wellknown free-air blast scenarios. Detailed three-dimensional finite element simulations using LS-Dyna are carried out to provide additional insights into the pressure evolution and transient response of the ductile plates. The numerical results are validated against experimental data where they were found to be in reasonable agreements. Numerical predictions reveal that complex pressure wave interactions within the blast chamber, and the saturated impulse effect attribute, in part, or combination, to the aforesaid phenomenon. The discussions on the limitation of the current findings are also provided, highlighting its dependency on the confinement's geometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据