4.7 Article

Buckling analysis of cracked orthotropic 3D plates and shells via an isogeometric-reproducing kernel particle method

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102993

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nanyang Technological University Research Scholarship, Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces an IGA-RKPM coupling approach to study the buckling behavior of cracked isotropic and orthotropic plate and shell structures. The approach successfully overcomes the barrier of global parameterization, preserves geometry exactness, and offers a higher-order approximation based on IGA basis functions with local refinement flexibility. By comparing results with existing literature, the efficacy and robustness of the proposed coupling approach have been demonstrated.
This paper aims to develop a three-dimensional isogeometric-reproducing kernel particle method (IGA-RKPM) coupling approach to study the buckling behavior of cracked isotropic and orthotropic plate and shell structures. The IGA and RKPM-based meshfree methods are coupled successfully through a reproducing condition in the physical domain that guarantees the higher-order polynomial continuity of basis functions and overcomes the barrier of global parameterization in the physical domain. The resulting coupling approach not only preserves the geometry exactness and offers a higher-order approximation based on IGA basis functions but also allows local refinement flexibility. Linear eigenvalue buckling analyses for cracked orthotropic plate and shell structures have been carried out within the framework of the proposed coupling approach. The effects of several parameters such as the crack length ratio, thickness-to-length ratio, and orthotropy angle on the critical buckling stress of the structures have been investigated in detail under different boundary and loading conditions. The efficacy and robustness of the proposed coupling approach have been demonstrated by comparing the present results with those available in literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据