4.5 Article

Synthesis of Fatty 1,2,4-Trioxanes by Peracetalization of β-Hydroxy Hydroperoxides

期刊

SYNTHESIS-STUTTGART
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 617-628

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1643-3057

关键词

beta-hydroxy hydroperoxides; aldehydes; peracetalization; 1,2,4-trioxanes; fatty acids

资金

  1. region Auvergne Rhone-Alpes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study involved the peracetalization of a beta-hydroxy hydroperoxide derived from methyl oleate using benzaldehyde as a model substrate to produce fatty 1,2,4-trioxane. Different acid catalysts and solvents were investigated to optimize the reaction conditions, resulting in the formation of a mixture of regioisomers with only one diastereoisomer of each. Although the antimalarial activity of the trioxanes synthesized was not significant against Plasmodium falciparum, the study provided valuable insights into the synthesis and potential biological activity of these compounds.
The peracetalization of a beta-hydroxy hydroperoxide derived from methyl oleate was studied using benzaldehyde as a model substrate to give the corresponding fatty 1,2,4-trioxane. The desired product was obtained as a mixture of regioisomers but only one diastereoisomer of each was formed. The nature of the acid catalyst was studied and both p -toluene sulfonic acid (PTSA) and Amberlyst A35 (A35) were found to be efficient homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts, respectively. The nature of the solvent was also investigated and ethereal solvents such as 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF), methyl tert -butyl ether (MTBE) and cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) gave the best NMR yield (85%) for the preparation of the fatty trioxane. The optimized conditions were applied to a range of aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes, and the corresponding 1,2,4-trioxanes were isolated with 30-91% yields (21 examples). The antimalarial activity of three trioxanes was studied against Plasmodium falciparum, however, no significant activity was detected (IC (50) >1600 nM).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据