4.6 Article

Improved submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection with slant tunnel for submucosal tumors in proximal esophagus

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08503-0

关键词

Slant Tunnel; Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection; Proximal Esophagus

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81861168036, 81702305]
  2. Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Shanghai Municipality [19411951600, 19411951601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The innovative STER with slant tunnel showed promising results in resecting submucosal tumors in the proximal esophagus, with high en bloc resection and curative rates. Complications were rare and successfully managed with conservative treatment.
Background The improved submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) with slant tunnel was created by our group innovatively for submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the proximal esophagus. This study aimed to provide the preliminary results of the improved STER from our center. Methods The key step of the improved STER is establishing a slant tunnel instead of a vertical tunnel. After a longitudinal incision was made proximally in the inclined top to the tumor, a submucosal tunnel was established from the incision to the SMT slantingly. 28 patients undergoing STER with slant tunnel were enrolled in the retrospective study. Clinical results including en bloc resection, curative resection and complication were collected. Results All the submucous tumors located at proximal esophagus originated from muscularis propria were successfully resected by the innovative STER. Tumor size ranged from 18-43 mm, with 96.4% (27/28) en bloc resection rate and 92.9% (26/28) curative rate. Three patients suffered complication, 1 patient with mild pleural effusion and another 2 patients with fever for one day. All of the complications were cured by conservative treatment. Conclusions STER with slant tunnel seems to provide an optional treatment for tumors in proximal esophagus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据