4.6 Article

Safety and feasibility of robotic liver resection after previous abdominal surgeries

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08572-1

关键词

Robotic liver surgery; Minimally invasive liver surgery; Surgical Robot

类别

资金

  1. Intuitive Surgical Deutschland GmbH
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FE14.34-2.1, SCHM2661/32]
  3. Deutscher Akademischer Auslandsdienst (DAAD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that robotic liver surgery is safe and feasible for patients with prior abdominal surgeries, despite limited experience in the field. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes in robotic liver resection showed no significant differences between patients with and without prior surgeries.
Background While minimally invasive liver surgery has been increasingly adopted at least for minor resections, experience with robotic liver surgery is still limited to a few highly specialized centers. Due to the fear of abdominal adhesions, a history of prior surgeries is still used as an argument for open approaches. Methods Clinical data of all consecutive robotic resections at our center, using the da Vinci Xi surgical system, between April, 2018 and December, 2020, were collected and analyzed as part of a prospective, post-marketing observational study (DRKS00017229). Prior abdominal surgeries were specified according to the surgical approach and localization. Baseline and perioperative outcome criteria were compared between patients with prior surgeries (PS) and patients with no prior surgeries (NPS) in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Out of the 126 patients undergoing robotic liver resections, 59% had a history of abdominal surgeries, which were most often colorectal resections (28%) followed by liver resections (20%). Patients with NPS were more likely to undergo robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma or benign tumors, and to have underlying liver cirrhosis when compared to patients with PS. Other baseline characteristics as well as the extent of resections were similar. Duration of surgery (258 min), conversion rates (6%), and postoperative complications rates (21% Clavien-Dindo >= 3) showed no differences between NPS and PS. A subgroup of patients with a history of prior liver surgery showed a longer duration of surgery in univariate analysis. However, this was not confirmed in multivariate analysis which instead revealed tumor entity and liver cirrhosis as independently correlated with duration of surgery. Conclusions We propose robotic liver resection to be safe and feasible, including in patients with prior abdominal surgeries. Each patient should be evaluated for a minimally invasive procedure regardless of a history of previous operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据