4.7 Article

3D antifouling hierarchical micro/nanostructures with underwater superoleophobicity via one-step electrodeposition on anode and cathode

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 421, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127356

关键词

Nickel coating; Hierarchical structure; Superhydrophilicity; Oil/water separation

资金

  1. Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2018JY0457, 2019YFS0502, 2021YFG0275]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a method to simultaneously deposit superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic properties on the anode and cathode, resulting in materials with superior antifouling capability and excellent oil/water separation efficiency. The fabricated materials also demonstrate outstanding corrosion resistance and maintain high separation efficiency even after 20 cycles.
Superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic materials have demonstrated good application prospects in the oil/water separation. However, their fabrication process may be inefficient and high energy consumption. For this reason, this paper proposes a method for simultaneously deposited hierarchical structures with super-hydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic properties on the anode and cathode via one-step electrodeposition. The materials fabricated on both anode and cathode exhibit superior antifouling performance and excellent oil/water separation efficiency (above 96.2% for all five experimental oils) with a considerable permeation flux (4125 +/- 67 L m(-2) h(-1)). Moreover, the as-prepared materials maintain excellent oil/water separation efficiency after 20 separation cycles, which are higher than 98.1% and 98.8%, respectively. Besides, the materials can be stored in different concentrations of salt water for 50 days, demonstrating their outstanding corrosion resistance. Our study provides a strategy for the fabrication of superwetting materials, which is expected to promote the development of oil/water separation technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据