4.7 Article

Microstructure evolution and crystallographic slip modes during grind hardening in TC21 titanium alloy

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 417, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127211

关键词

Grind hardening; EBSD; Microstructure evolution; Titanium alloy; Splitting mechanisms

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, microstructure evolution and slip mechanism of TC21 titanium alloy in grind hardening and aging treatment were investigated, showing that the hardened layer mainly consisted of TiN. Tensile strength and elongation increased after grind hardening process, with different effects observed in grind hardening and aging treatment. The study also demonstrated a method to deduce slip systems using interior crystall misorientation axis, identifying three major slip systems.
In this work, the microstructure evolution and slip mechanism of TC21 titanium alloy in grind hardening (GH) and grind hardening and aging treatment (GHAG) were comparatively investigated. The experimental results showed that the hardened layer formed in both GH and GHAG is mainly composed of TiN, while their internal microstructure is quite different. Compared with as-received alloy, the tensile strength and elongation after GH process increased by 110 MPa and 1.5%, respectively. The tensile strength after GH process increased by 50 MPa but the elongation decreased by 0.2%. Moreover, A method to deduce slip systems by using interior crystall misorientation axis (ICMA) was demonstrated in this paper. The distribution of ICMA indicated that three major slip systems were activated which was verified by texture components in ODF sections. The slipping results in two kinds of crystal orientation distribution: (a) the activated slip plane parallel to loading stress; (b) the slip direction parallel to loading stress, but existing a deviation angle between slip plane and loading stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据