4.4 Article

Bayesian Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling: An Investigation into Robust Prior Distributions for the Doubly Latent Categorical Model

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2021.1915146

关键词

Bayesian; robust priors; multilevel models

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [406-15-264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bayesian estimation of multilevel structural equation models has advantages in terms of sample size requirements and computational feasibility, but careful specification of the prior distribution, especially for random effects variance parameters, is necessary. The paper investigates alternative, more robust prior distributions for the doubly latent categorical multilevel model, highlighting the importance of constructing reasonable priors for multiple random effects variance parameters in MLSEMs. Although the robust priors outperform the traditional inverse-Gamma prior, consideration of hyperparameters is still crucial.
Bayesian estimation of multilevel structural equation models (MLSEMs) offers advantages in terms of sample size requirements and computational feasibility, but does require careful specification of the prior distribution especially for the random effects variance parameters. The traditional non-informative conjugate choice of an inverse-Gamma prior with small hyperparameters has been shown time and again to be problematic. In this paper, we investigate alternative, more robust prior distributions for the doubly latent categorical multilevel model. In contrast to multilevel models without latent variables, MLSEMs have multiple random effects variance parameters both for the multilevel structure and for the latent variable structure. It is therefore even more important to construct reasonable priors for these parameters. We find that, although the robust priors outperform the traditional inverse-Gamma prior, their hyperparameters do require careful consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据