4.7 Article

Topology optimization of multiple-barrier synchronous reluctance motors with initial random hollow circles

期刊

STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 2213-2224

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-02976-2

关键词

Topology optimization; Synchronous reluctance motor; Maximum torque per ampere; Finite element analysis; Initial random hollow circle; Torque ripple

资金

  1. Korea Maritime Transportation Safety Authority (KOMSA), South Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed a novel topology optimization for multiple-barrier SynRMs, inspired by the biological structure of trabecular bone in infancy. By considering the nonlinear B-H curve and the dq-axis-dependent penalization scheme, the study analyzed the impact of multiple barriers on motor performance.
Multiple air barriers and iron webs of the synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) are vital to achieving higher average torque and a lower ripple torque. However, it is challenging to determine the optimum multiple barriers because the optimization results are significantly affected by the initial flux path and moreover are sensitive to a penalization scheme in the topology optimization. Interestingly, in nature, the hollow circular patterns of the trabecular bone at infancy gradually adapt to the optimal (also very complicated) trabecular architecture, which provides a characteristic lightweight design. Inspired by the above observation, this study proposed a novel topology optimization for multiple-barrier SynRMs, which initially started from random hollow circles. To distinguish between iron and air, the dq-axis-dependent penalization scheme is also proposed instead of a conventional spatially constant penalization scheme. Using the adjoint variable method, the analytical sensitivity was derived to consider a nonlinear B-H curve in the topology optimization. By optimizing various SynRMs with different filtering radii, this study investigated the relationship between multiple barriers and motor performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据