4.7 Article

Local stress constraints in topology optimization of structures subjected to arbitrary dynamic loads: a stress aggregation-free approach

期刊

STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 3287-3309

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-02954-8

关键词

Local stress constraints; Topology optimization; Augmented Lagrangian; HHT-alpha method; Newmark-beta method; Elastodynamics

资金

  1. US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The approach is based on an augmented Lagrangian method, effectively solving stress-constrained topology optimization problems for structures subjected to general dynamic loading. Normalizing the penalty term and penalizing constraints associated with high stress values more severely are key strategies employed for handling problems with a large number of stress constraints.
We present an augmented Lagrangian-based approach for stress-constrained topology optimization of structures subjected to general dynamic loading. The approach renders structures that satisfy the stress constraints locally at every time step. To solve problems with a large number of stress constraints, we normalize the penalty term of the augmented Lagrangian function with respect to the total number of constraints (i.e., the number of elements in the mesh times the number of time steps). Moreover, we solve the stress-constrained problem effectively by penalizing constraints associated with high stress values more severely than those associated with low stress values. We integrate the equations of motion using the HHT-method and conduct the sensitivity analysis consistently with this method via the discretize-then-differentiate approach. We present several numerical examples that elucidate the effectiveness of the approach to solve dynamic, stress-constrained problems under several loading scenarios including loads that change in magnitude and/or direction and loads that change in position as a function of time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据