4.5 Article

Estimating optimal dynamic treatment strategies under resource constraints using dynamic marginal structural models

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 40, 期 23, 页码 4996-5005

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.9107

关键词

dynamic strategy; HIV; marginal structural models; monitoring; optimal strategy; resource constraints

资金

  1. NIH [R37 AI102634, T32 AI007433]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods for estimating optimal treatment strategies often assume unlimited resources, but practical constraints such as limited funds or medication access require considering competition for resources. While solving this problem for single exposure points is established, extending it to dynamic treatment strategies presents challenges.
Methods for estimating optimal treatment strategies typically assume unlimited access to resources. However, when a health system has resource constraints, such as limited funds, access to medication, or monitoring capabilities, medical decisions must account for competition between individuals in resource usage. The problem of incorporating resource constraints into optimal treatment strategies has been solved for point exposures (1), that is, treatment strategies entailing a decision at just one time point. However, attempts to directly generalize the point exposure solution to dynamic time-varying treatment strategies run into complications. We sidestep these complications by targeting the optimal strategy within a clinically defined subclass. Our approach is to employ dynamic marginal structural models to estimate (counterfactual) resource usage under the class of candidate treatment strategies and solve a constrained optimization problem to choose the optimal strategy for which expected resource usage is within acceptable limits. We apply this method to determine the optimal dynamic monitoring strategy for people living with HIV when resource limits on monitoring exist using observational data from the HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据