期刊
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 40, 期 26, 页码 5765-5778出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.9152
关键词
cluster randomized trial; completely randomized; matched-pair; randomization; simple randomization; stratified
类别
资金
- Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Public Health Postgraduate Scholarship
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula
Simulation was used to compare the efficiency of matched-pair design, stratified design, and simple design in cluster randomized trials. Results showed that matched-pair design was generally the most efficient when the matching correlation was moderate to strong, while stratified design and simple design were more efficient for weak matching correlations.
For cluster randomized trials (CRTs) with a small number of clusters, the matched-pair (MP) design, where clusters are paired before randomizing one to each trial arm, is often recommended to minimize imbalance on known prognostic factors, add face-validity to the study, and increase efficiency, provided the analysis recognizes the matching. Little evidence exists to guide decisions on when to use matching. We used simulation to compare the efficiency of the MP design with the stratified and simple designs, based on the mean confidence interval width of the estimated intervention effect. Matched and unmatched analyses were used for the MP design; a stratified analysis was used for the stratified design; and analyses without and with post-stratification adjustment for factors that would otherwise have been used for restricted allocation were used for the simple design. Results showed the MP design was generally the most efficient for CRTs with 10 or more pairs when the correlation between cluster-level outcomes within pairs (matching correlation) was moderate to strong (0.3-0.5). There was little gain in efficiency for the MP or stratified designs compared to simple randomization when the matching correlation was weak (0.05-0.1). For trials with four pairs of clusters, the simple and stratified designs were more efficient than the MP design because greater degrees of freedom were available for the analysis, although an unmatched analysis of the MP design recovered precision for weak matching correlations. Practical guidance on choosing between the MP, stratified, and simple designs is provided.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据