Duration and reliability of the silent period in individuals with spinal cord injury

Design Prospective cohort study. Objectives We aim to better understand the silent period (SP), an inhibitory counterpart to the well-known motor evoked potential (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting Veterans Affairs Hospital in New York. Methods EMG responses were measured in the target abductor pollicis brevis at rest (TMS at 120% of resting motor threshold (RMT)) and during maximal effort (TMS at 110% of RMT). Participants with chronic cervical SCI (n = 9) and AB participants (n = 12) underwent between 3 and 7 sessions of testing on separate days. The primary outcomes were the magnitude and reliability of SP duration, resting and active MEP amplitudes, and RMT. Results SCI participants showed significantly lower MEP amplitudes compared to AB participants. SCI SP duration was not significantly different from AB SP duration. SP duration demonstrated reduced intra-participant variability within and across sessions compared with MEP amplitudes. SCI participants also demonstrated a higher prevalence of SP 'interruptions' compared to AB participants. Conclusions In a small group of individuals with chronic cervical SCI, we confirmed the well-known findings that SCI individuals have lower TMS evoked potential amplitudes and a tendency toward higher TMS motor thresholds relative to able-bodied controls. We did not observe a significant difference in SP duration between individuals with versus without SCI. However, SP duration is a more reliable outcome within and across multiple sessions than MEP amplitude.

Automated summary

Through a prospective cohort study, researchers aimed to understand the silent period (SP) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The results showed that SCI participants had lower MEP amplitudes compared to able-bodied participants, but no significant difference was found in SP duration. SP duration was found to be a more reliable outcome measure across multiple testing sessions compared to MEP amplitudes.