4.8 Article

Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: History, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, and Rome IV

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 150, 期 6, 页码 1262-+

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032

关键词

Functional GI Disorders; Rome Foundation; Rome Criteria; History; Biopsychosocial Model; Neurogastroenterology; Patient Provider Relationship; Rome IV; Classification; Diagnosis; Treatment Approach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), the most common diagnoses in gastroenterology, are recognized by morphologic and physiological abnormalities that often occur in combination including motility disturbance, visceral hypersensitivity, altered mucosal and immune function, altered gut microbiota, and altered central nervous system processing. Research on these gut-brain interaction disorders is based on using specific diagnostic criteria. The Rome Foundation has played a pivotal role in creating diagnostic criteria, thus operationalizing the dissemination of new knowledge in the field of FGIDs. Rome IV is a compendium of the knowledge accumulated since Rome III was published 10 years ago. It improves upon Rome III by: (1) updating the basic and clinical literature; (2) offering new information on gut microenvironment, gut-brain interactions, pharmacogenomics, biopsychosocial, gender and cross-cultural understandings of FGIDs; (3) reduces the use of imprecise and occasionally stigmatizing terms when possible; (4) uses updated diagnostic algorithms; and (5) incorporates information on the patient illness experience, and physiological subgroups or biomarkers that might lead to more targeted treatment. This introductory article sets the stage for the remaining 17 articles that follow and offers a historical overview of the FGID field, differentiates FGIDs from motility and structural disorders, discusses the changes from Rome III, reviews the Rome committee process, provides a biopsychosocial pathophysiological conceptualization of FGIDs, and offers an approach to patient care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据