4.4 Article

Hidden Fermi liquidity and topological criticality in the finite temperature Kitaev model

期刊

SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2021.114308

关键词

Quantum spin liquids; Strongly correlated systems; Superconductivity; Mott Insulator Transition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers studied the Jordan-Wigner fermionized Kitaev spin liquid at finite temperature using exact diagonalization and Monte Carlo simulation, revealing the formation of checkerboard or stripy-ordered flux crystals at different flux densities. They also uncovered the Mott transition in the Kitaev model and the connection between the Kitaev Toric Code phase and superconductors.
The fate of exotic spin liquid states with fractionalized excitations at finite temperature (T) is of great interest, since signatures of fractionalization manifest in finite-temperature (T) dynamics in real systems, above the tiny magnetic ordering scales. Here, we study a Jordan-Wigner (JW) fermionized Kitaev spin liquid at finite T employing combined exact diagonalization and Monte Carlo simulation methods. We uncover (i) checkerboard or stripy-ordered flux crystals depending on density of flux, and (ii) establish, surprisingly, that: (a) the finite T version of the T = 0 transition from a gapless to gapped phases in the Kitaev model is a Mott transition of the fermions, belonging to the two-dimensional Ising universality class. These transitions correspond to a topological transition between a string condensate and a dilute closed string state (b) the Mott insulatorphase is a precise realization of Laughlin's gossamer (here, p-wave) superconductor (g-SC), and (c) the Kitaev Toric Code phase (TC) is adiabatically connected to the g-SC, and is a fully Gutzwiller-projected fermi sea of JW fermions. These findings establish the finite -T quantum spin liquid phases in the d = 2 to be hidden Fermi liquid(s) of neutral fermions. Superscript/Subscript Available

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据