4.6 Article

Solution processable graphene derivative used in a bilayer anode with conductive PEDOT:PSS on the non-fullerene PBDB-T:ITIC based organic solar cells

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 656-665

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.07.049

关键词

Graphene derivative; PEDOT:PSS (PH1000); Alternative anode; Organic solar cells

资金

  1. CONACyT (Mexico) through Laboratorio Nacional de Materiales Grafenicos
  2. PAPIIT-UNAM project [IN208919]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel bilayer anode material composed of a graphene derivative and PH1000 polymer is proposed as a sustainable alternative to ITO in the manufacture of organic solar cells. The new material exhibits good performance characteristics such as low cost and ease of processing, showing potential for replacing ITO as an anode material.
In this work, a semi-transparent, low-cost and easy processable graphene derivative and PH1000 (conductive PEDOT:PSS polymer) based bilayer anode, is presented as a sustainable potential alternative to ITO. The simple mechanical-synthesized graphene derivative was in aqueous-suspension processed (SPG) and drop-coated onto a common glass substrates. The SPG film presents a Raman intensity ratio (I-D/I-G) of 0.56 and a number of 7 sheets theoretically estimated. Modified PH1000 with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was spin-coated onto SPG layer. The bilayer anode (SPG/PH1000) exhibits a transmittance, roughness and resistance of 82% (550 nm), 9 nm and 22651/sq, respectively. The bilayer alternative electrode is used in the manufacture of organic solar cells (OSCs) based on the non-fullerene PBDB-T:ITIC active layer. Average power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.3% (best 8.6%) is attained for control devices (using ITO as anode) and 4.0% (best 4.2%) for devices with the alternative SPG/PH1000 bilayer anode. For OSCs fabrication, a vacuum free deposited top electrode Field's metal (FM, an eutectic alloy of Bi 32.5%, In 51% and Sn 16.5%, with a melting point above 62 degrees C) was used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据