4.7 Article

Naphthalene degradation in aqueous solution by Fe(II) activated persulfate coupled with citric acid

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118441

关键词

Naphthalene; Persulfate oxidation; Citric acid; Degradation mechanism; Groundwater remediation

资金

  1. One Belt and One Road International Academic Cooperation and Exchange Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [19230742200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41977164]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that adding CA to the Fe(II) activated PS oxidation system can significantly enhance the degradation of NAP, achieving a removal rate of 97.5%. The effectiveness of the PS/Fe(II)/CA process for NAP degradation in actual groundwater showed promising results.
More and more attention has been paid to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated sites caused by coking industries and chemical manufactures. In this study, the degradation performance of naphthalene (NAP), one of the typical pollutants in PAHs contaminated sites, in persulfate (PS) oxidation system activated by Fe(II) coupled with citric acid (CA) was investigated. The effects of PS, CA, and Fe(II) dosages on NAP were evaluated. 97.5% removal of NAP was obtained at the molar ratio of 15/5/1/1 of PS/Fe(II)/CA/NAP within 120 min, demonstrating that the addition of CA could significantly strengthen NAP degradation. The results of probe tests, EPR detection and scavenging experiments suggested that HO? played a predominant role in the degradation of NAP. The effect of surfactants including tween-80 (TW-80) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on NAP degradation was explored. Moreover, the major degradation intermediates of NAP were determined by GC?MS and the possible degradation pathways of NAP were proposed. Finally, the effectiveness of PS/Fe(II)/CA process for NAP degradation in the actual groundwater demonstrated that this technique has a remarkable preponderance and prospect in NAP contaminated groundwater remediation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据