4.7 Article

Flexible MXene/rGO/CuO hybrid aerogels for high performance acetone sensing at room temperature

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 340, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129946

关键词

MXene; rGO aerogel; CuO nanopartice; Acetone; Gas sensor; Room temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61102006, 51871111]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2018LE006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a high-performance room temperature gas-sensing material was successfully developed by utilizing MXene and reduced graphene oxide as building blocks. The resulting 3D aerogel shows excellent acetone-sensing performance at room temperature, with fast response and recovery times, as well as good reproducibility and selectivity. This strategy of composite 3D graphene/MXene architectures with metal oxide semiconductors provides a new pathway for future development of room temperature gas sensors.
The design and construction of high-performance room temperature gas-sensing materials have attracted great attention in the field of current gas sensor technology. Herein, we report an efficient approach for the production of ultrafine CuO nanoparticles-decorated three-dimensional (3D) hybrid aerogel by employing MXene (Ti3C2Tx) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanosheets as cobuilding blocks. Benefiting from the synergistic effects of highly interconnected porous networks, large specific surface areas, homogeneous CuO nanoparticles dispersion, and good electron conductivity, the resulting 3D MXene/rGO/CuO aerogel expresses high acetone-sensing performance at room temperature (RT). The sensor response toward 100 ppm acetone is 52.09 % at RT with the fast response time (-6.5 s) and recovery time (-7.5 s), excellent reproducibility and selectivity. The strategy of compositing 3D graphene/MXene architectures with metal oxide semiconductor provides a novel pathway for the future development of RT gas sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据