4.7 Article

High-efficient and reversible temperature sensor fabricated from highly luminescent CdTe/ZnS-SiO2 nanocomposites for rolling bearings

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
卷 328, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2021.112758

关键词

Temperature dependence; Reversible thermal stability; Quantum dot sensor; High-speed bearings

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China
  2. New Lubrication Technology for High Speed and High Precision Bearing [2018YFB2000603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CdTe/ZnS-SiO2 nanocomposites exhibit high photoluminescence, outstanding reversible thermal stability, and low biotoxicity, making them suitable for temperature sensors, especially for high-speed bearings.
CdTe quantum dots (QDs) have broad application prospects in the field of thermal monitoring of bearing rotating components owing to the linear temperature dependence of their photoluminescence. However, their practical application can be limited by irreversible thermal stability. In this work, we synthesized CdTe/ZnS-SiO2 nanocomposites by a reversed-phase microemulsion method based on CdTe QDs prepared in an aqueous phase. The structure and optical performance of as-synthesized CdTe/ZnS-SiO2 were characterized. CdTe/ZnS-SiO2 shows high photoluminescence, outstanding reversible thermal stability, and low biotoxicity because of the elimination of surface defects on the QDs by the ZnS layer and inorganic protection by the SiO2 layer. The photoluminescence spectra of CdTe/ZnS-SiO2 show linear relationship and reversible thermal stability during heating and cooling cycle processes from room temperature to 80 degrees C, which facilitates their practical application as temperature sensors. The highly efficient and reversible temperature sensor fabricated from highly luminescent CdTe/ZnS-SiO2 nanocomposites has significant application value in the thermal monitoring field, especially for high-speed bearings under various conditions. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据