4.6 Article

Identification of Specific Substances in the FAIMS Spectra of Complex Mixtures Using Deep Learning

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21186160

关键词

FAIMS; deep learning; mixture; substance recognition; accuracy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62163009, 61864001, 61761013]
  2. state key program of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Program [2021JJD170019]
  3. Foundation of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Automatic Detecting Technology and Instruments (Guilin University of Electronic Technology) [YQ21111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that the FAIMS system can effectively identify specific chemicals within complex mixtures, and the accuracy is improved by using a deep learning model.
High-field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) spectra of single chemicals are easy to interpret but identifying specific chemicals within complex mixtures is difficult. This paper demonstrates that the FAIMS system can detect specific chemicals in complex mixtures. A homemade FAIMS system is used to analyze pure ethanol, ethyl acetate, acetone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, butanone, and their mixtures in order to create datasets. An EfficientNetV2 discriminant model was constructed, and a blind test set was used to verify whether the deep-learning model is capable of the required task. The results show that the pre-trained EfficientNetV2 model completed convergence at a learning rate of 0.1 as well as 200 iterations. Specific substances in complex mixtures can be effectively identified using the trained model and the homemade FAIMS system. Accuracies of 100%, 96.7%, and 86.7% are obtained for ethanol, ethyl acetate, and acetone in the blind test set, which are much higher than conventional methods. The deep learning network provides higher accuracy than traditional FAIMS spectral analysis methods. This simplifies the FAIMS spectral analysis process and contributes to further development of FAIMS systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据