4.6 Article

An Integrated Mission Planning Framework for Sensor Allocation and Path Planning of Heterogeneous Multi-UAV Systems

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21103557

关键词

heterogeneous multi-UAVs system; airborne sensor allocation; path planning; mission planning; two-level adaptive variable neighborhood search

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [61973101]
  2. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [20180577005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an integrated mission planning framework using a two-level adaptive variable neighborhood search algorithm to maximize profit and minimize costs, showing better performance compared to conventional methods through simulation results.
Mission planning is the guidance for a UAV team to perform missions, which plays the most critical role in military and civil applications. For complex tasks, it requires heterogeneous cooperative multi-UAVs to satisfy several mission requirements. Meanwhile, airborne sensor allocation and path planning are the critical components of heterogeneous multi-UAVs system mission planning problems, which affect the mission profit to a large extent. This paper establishes the mathematical model for the integrated sensor allocation and path planning problem to maximize the total task profit and minimize travel costs, simultaneously. We present an integrated mission planning framework based on a two-level adaptive variable neighborhood search algorithm to address the coupled problem. The first-level is devoted to planning a reasonable airborne sensor allocation plan, and the second-level aims to optimize the path of the heterogeneous multi-UAVs system. To improve the mission planning framework's efficiency, an adaptive mechanism is presented to guide the search direction intelligently during the iterative process. Simulation results show that the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Compared to the conventional methods, the better performance of planning results is achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据