4.6 Review

Ten Years of Lateral Flow Immunoassay Technique Applications: Trends, Challenges and Future Perspectives

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21155185

关键词

lateral flow immunoassay; lateral flow assay applications; paper-based biosensor; immunochromatographic strip test; rapid diagnostic test; point-of-care testing

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, University and Research of Italy [PRIN: 2017Y2PAB8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LFIA is a successful analytical platform for on-site detection of target substances, with features like rapidity, simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and usability by nonskilled personnel. It is widely used in clinical diagnostic and other fields due to its wide acceptance. This review provides a 10-year overview of LFIA applications, discussing future perspectives and challenges.
The Lateral Flow Immunoassay (LFIA) is by far one of the most successful analytical platforms to perform the on-site detection of target substances. LFIA can be considered as a sort of lab-in-a-hand and, together with other point-of-need tests, has represented a paradigm shift from sample-to-lab to lab-to-sample aiming to improve decision making and turnaround time. The features of LFIAs made them a very attractive tool in clinical diagnostic where they can improve patient care by enabling more prompt diagnosis and treatment decisions. The rapidity, simplicity, relative cost-effectiveness, and the possibility to be used by nonskilled personnel contributed to the wide acceptance of LFIAs. As a consequence, from the detection of molecules, organisms, and (bio)markers for clinical purposes, the LFIA application has been rapidly extended to other fields, including food and feed safety, veterinary medicine, environmental control, and many others. This review aims to provide readers with a 10-years overview of applications, outlining the trends for the main application fields and the relative compounded annual growth rates. Moreover, future perspectives and challenges are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据