4.6 Article

Optimization of Virtual Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensing

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21144698

关键词

wavefront sensing; aberration measurement; Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing; digital wavefront processing; parameter optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61575205, 61805248]
  2. Frontier Technology Development Foundation of IOE-CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the data processing procedure and methods of Virtual Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing (vSHWS) were demonstrated, and the parameters were optimized to achieve the best performance, significantly improving its anti-noise performance.
Virtual Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing (vSHWS) can flexibly adjust parameters to meet different requirements without changing the system, and it is a promising means for aberration measurement. However, how to optimize its parameters to achieve the best performance is rarely discussed. In this work, the data processing procedure and methods of vSHWS were demonstrated by using a set of normal human ocular aberrations as an example. The shapes (round and square) of a virtual lenslet, the zero-padding of the sub-aperture electric field, sub-aperture number, as well as the sequences (before and after diffraction calculation), algorithms, and interval of data interpolation, were analyzed to find the optimal configuration. The effect of the above optimizations on its anti-noise performance was also studied. The Zernike coefficient errors and the root mean square of the wavefront error between the reconstructed and preset wavefronts were used for performance evaluation. The performance of the optimized vSHWS could be significantly improved compared to that of a non-optimized one, which was also verified with 20 sets of clinical human ocular aberrations. This work makes the vSHWS's implementation clearer, and the optimization methods and the obtained results are of great significance for its applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据