4.6 Article

Fully Learnable Model for Task-Driven Image Compressed Sensing

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21144662

关键词

convolutional neural networks; compressed sensing; deep learning; image reconstruction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771262]
  2. Tianjin Science and Technology Major Project and Engineering [18ZXRHNC00140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a FLCS model, which achieves task-driven image compressed sensing through training three learnable components. Pre-trained FLCS can improve the quality of reconstructed images and reduce the running time significantly compared to existing methods.
This study primarily investigates image sensing at low sampling rates with convolutional neural networks (CNN) for specific applications. To improve the image acquisition efficiency in energy-limited systems, this study, inspired by compressed sensing, proposes a fully learnable model for task-driven image-compressed sensing (FLCS). The FLCS, based on Deep Convolution Generative Adversarial Networks (DCGAN) and Variational Auto-encoder (VAE), divides the image-compressed sensing model into three learnable parts, i.e., the Sampler, the Solver and the Rebuilder. To be specific, a measurement matrix suitable for a type of image is obtained by training the Sampler. The Solver calculates the image's low-dimensional representation with the measurements. The Rebuilder learns a mapping from the low-dimensional latent space to the image space. All the mentioned could be trained jointly or individually for a range of application scenarios. The pre-trained FLCS reconstructs images with few iterations for task-driven compressed sensing. As indicated from the experimental results, compared with existing approaches, the proposed method could significantly improve the reconstructed images' quality while decreasing the running time. This study is of great significance for the application of image-compressed sensing at low sampling rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据