4.3 Article

Iron metabolism in infections: Focus on COVID-19

期刊

SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 182-187

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2021.07.001

关键词

COVID-19; Iron; Ferritin; Hepcidin; Immunity

资金

  1. ENACT from the Cariverona Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron is a micronutrient essential for metabolic processes and plays a crucial role in infections. Hepcidin subtracts iron from pathogens by sequestering it into host cells. Iron metabolism affects immune cells' functionality and the immune response.
Iron is a micronutrient essential for a wide range of metabolic processes in virtually all living organisms. During infections, a battle for iron takes place between the human host and the invading pathogens. The liver peptide hepcidin, which is phylogenetically and structurally linked to defensins (antimicrobial peptides of the innate immunity), plays a pivotal role by subtracting iron to pathogens through its sequestration into host cells, mainly macrophages. While this phenomenon is well studied in certain bacterial infections, much less is known regarding viral infections. Iron metabolism also has implications on the functionality of cells of the immune system. Once primed by the contact with antigen presenting cells, lymphocytes need iron to sustain the metabolic burst required for mounting an effective cellular and humoral response. The COVID-19 pandemic has boosted an amount of clinical and translational research over the possible influences of nutrients on SARS-CoV-2 infection, in terms of either susceptibility or clinical course. Here we review the intersections between iron metabolism and COVID-19, belonging to the wider domain of the so-called nutritional immunity. A better understanding of such connections has potential broad implications, either from a mechanistic standpoint, or for the development of more effective strategies for managing COVID-19 and possible future pandemics. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据