4.4 Article

Evaluation of secondary electron intensities for dopant profiling in ion implanted semiconductors: a correlative study combining SE, SIMS and ECV methods

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6641/ac0854

关键词

dopant profiling; helium ion microscopy; secondary electrons; secondary ion mass spectrometry; electrochemical capacitance-voltage

资金

  1. Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) [INTER/SNF/16/11536628, PRIDE17/12246511/PACE]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF), Switzerland [200021L_172924/1]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021L_172924] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the secondary electron dopant contrast in scanning electron microscopy and helium ion microscopy on boron implanted silicon samples, showing the impact of thermal firing on activation efficiency. The results demonstrate that HIM provides higher contrast than SEM and has a clear advantage in terms of activation efficiency.
This study evaluates the secondary electron (SE) dopant contrast in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and helium ion microscopy (HIM) on boron implanted silicon sample. Complementary techniques like secondary ion mass spectrometry and electrochemical capacitance voltage (ECV) measurements are used to understand the dopant profile and active dopant distribution before and after a thermal firing, a step carried out to remove implantation damage and to electrically activate the implanted boron. Thermal firing resulted in an activation efficiency of 33%. HIM showed higher contrast than SEM having more defined peak with a lower background contribution. Variations in dopant concentration near the peak maximum were observed in ECV measurements, which was not observed in the intensity profiles from both SEM and HIM. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of SE dopant profiling as a quick tool to map the electrically active dopant concentrations even in far-from-equilibrium materials such as ion implanted samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据