4.7 Article

A carbide-reinforced Re0.5MoNbW(TaC)0.8 eutectic high-entropy composite with outstanding compressive properties

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.113909

关键词

Eutectic composite; Refractory high-entropy alloys; Carbide; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51932006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52001120]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [531118010450]
  4. Hundred Talent Program of Hunan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a high strength-ductile matching Re0.5MoNbW(TaC)(0.8) eutectic high-entropy composite was fabricated and demonstrated excellent mechanical properties that exceed previously reported refractory high-entropy alloys and HECs. The study suggests a strategy to design strong and ductile HECs for high-temperature applications.
Refractory high-entropy alloys are promising high-temperature materials owing to their excellent softening resistance. However, most RHEAs that can withstand softening at 1200 degrees C usually suffer from apparent brittleness at room temperature. Here, a high strength-ductile matching Re0.5MoNbW(TaC)(0.8) eutectic high-entropy composite (HEC) consisting of body-centered-cubic and multi-component carbide phases was fabricated by arc melting. The HEC exhibits a high yield strength (1340 MPa), ultimate compressive strength (2347 MPa) and plasticity (8.90 %), which exceeds those of previously reported RHEAs and HECs. Quantitative calculations based on experimental observations suggest that semi-coherent phase interface plays an essential role for strength enhancement, and interfacial dependent strengthening dominates among the interface strengthening terms. Our study envisages a strategy to design strong and ductile HECs aiming at high-temperature applications. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据