4.7 Article

The recycling of surgical face masks as sound porous absorbers: Preliminary evaluation

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 786, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147461

关键词

Sound fibrous absorber; Surgical face masks; Acoustic properties; Polypropylene fibers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discusses the potential use of plastic surgical face masks as sound porous absorber and evaluates their acoustic efficiency through experimental research. The results show high sound absorption values in samples made from scrapped face masks, suggesting they could be a possible substitute for traditional materials.
This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the acoustic efficiency of plastic surgical face masks. Since the very high number of disposable masks being used globally on a daily basis to face the Covid19 pandemic is posing new environmental risks, mainly connected to improper disposal, any possible improvements in the management of this waste stream is very important. In this work their potential use as sound porous absorber is discussed. Surgical face masks are mainly made of polypropylene fibers which show good acoustical properties. Their porous structure was studied through the measurement of some non-acoustic properties: bulk density, fiber diameter, porosity, flow resistivity and tortuosity. Moreover, the sound absorption performance of samples, made of scrapped face masks, with different thicknesses was evaluated using an impedance tube according to ISO 10534-2. The results obtained from the sound absorption spectra and two single indexes, Noise Reduction Coefficient and Sound Absorption Average showed a high sound absorption value over a frequency range of in-terest. Finally, the sound absorption spectra obtained for surgical face masks were compared with those obtained for fibrous materials currently used in building sector, suggesting that this fibrous waste could act as a possible substitute to traditional ones. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据