Coexistence of multiple leaf nutrient resorption strategies in a single ecosystem

Leaf resorption is critical for considerations of how plants use and recycle nutrients, but fundamental unknowns remain regarding the controls over plant nutrient resorption. Empirical studies suggest al least three basic types of resorption control, including (i) stoichiometric control, (ii) nutrient limitation control, and (iii) nutrient concentration control strategies. However, which strategies are adopted in given conditions and whether multiple strategies coexist in an ecosystem are still open questions. To address these unknowns, leaf nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) resorption efficiency (NRE and PRE) and proficiency were measured for seven woody species at a nutrient-rich but potentially N-limited secondary forest and a nutrient-poor and potentially P-limited secondary forest. NRE was higher in the N-limited forest while PRE was higher in the P-limited forest, suggesting that plants responded to nutrient limitation with preferential resorption of the more limiting nutrient. NRE: PRE was positively related to leaf N:P ratios within each forest, demonstrating a role for stoichiometric control. Nutrient concentration controls were also found, with higher nutrient resorption proficiency in the nutrient-poor forest than in the nutrient-rich forest. The controls of stoichiometry and nutrient concentration were community-wide, but the nutrient limitation control was species-specific. Our results highlight the coexistence of multiple nutrient resorption strategies in a single ecosystem, and suggest these strategies are scale-dependent. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

Our study found that plants in nutrient-limited forests exhibit higher nitrogen resorption efficiency, while those in phosphorus-limited forests show higher phosphorus resorption proficiency, indicating a preferential resorption of the more limiting nutrient in response to nutrient limitation. Stoichiometric control was demonstrated by the positive relationship between NRE: PRE and leaf N:P ratios within each forest. Additionally, nutrient concentration controls were observed, with higher resorption proficiency in the nutrient-poor forest than in the nutrient-rich forest.