4.6 Article

Upper bounds of Schubert polynomials

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-MATHEMATICS
卷 65, 期 6, 页码 1319-1330

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11425-020-1843-5

关键词

Schubert polynomial; key polynomial; flagged Weyl module; upper bound; Lorentzian polynomial

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11971250, 12071320]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2020YJ0006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the relationship between permutations and composition patterns, determining lower and upper bounding polynomials for different permutations and composition patterns. The results show that under specific conditions of avoiding certain permutation and composition patterns, the minimum and maximum values of key polynomials can be determined.
Let w be a permutation of { 1, 2 ... ,}, and let D(w) be the Rothe diagram of w. The Schubert polynomial zeta(w)(x) can be realized as the dual character of the flagged Weyl module associated with D(w). This implies the following coefficient-wise inequality: Min(w)(x) 6 Sw(x) 6 Max(w) (x), where both Min(w)(x) and Max(w)(x) are polynomials determined by D(w). Fink et al. (2018) found that zeta(w)(x) equals the lower bound Min(w)(x) if and only if w avoids twelve permutation patterns. In this paper, we show that zeta(w)(x) reaches the upper bound Max(w) (x) if and only if w avoids two permutation patterns 1432 and 1423. Similarly, for any given composition alpha is an element of Z(n) >0, one can define a lower bound Min(alpha)(x) and an upper bound Max(alpha)(x) for the key polynomial kappa(alpha)(x). Hodges and Yong (2020) established that kappa(alpha)(x) equals Min(alpha)(x) if and only if alpha avoids five composition patterns. We show that kappa(alpha)(x) equals Max(alpha)(x) if and only if ff avoids a single composition pattern (0, 2). As an application, we obtain that when alpha avoids (0; 2), the key polynomial kappa(alpha)(x) is Lorentzian, partially verifying a conjecture of Huh et al. (2019).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据